Simple Machines Forum
Bienvenue, Invité. Veuillez vous connecter ou vous enregistrer.
Mars 10, 2026, 09:23:28

Connexion avec identifiant, mot de passe et durée de la session
Recherche:     Recherche +
SMF - Just Installed
813158 Messages dans 661120 Sujets par 516398 Membres
Dernier membre: AlfredoCro
* Accueil Aide Recherche Identifiez-vous Enregistrez-vous
+  Simple Machines Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  one pass or two pass which is better
« sujet précédent | | sujet suivant »
Pages: [1] Imprimer
Auteur Sujet: one pass or two pass which is better  (Lu 9 fois)
pblbcqj46
Newbie
*
Messages: 5

580855868 jlszhgk88 tbfweso98
Voir le profil WWW
one pass or two pass which is better
« le: Mars 13, 2014, 07:01:48 »

so now i'm my computer is fairly old and also slow from rendering video and i'm wondering if the process will certainly speed up through changing into a single pass encoding option in premier pro as opposed to a 2 complete. is there any reason i will avoid one passbasically i don't know what exactly is different.
.
multipass encoders use the first pass to generate figures about the video to improve top quality in the next pass, so that you should count on the quality to be better using 2 goes than a single pass. yes, 1 cross encoding is more rapidly, but you tend to be trading speedy encode time regarding lesser video quality..
.
if you don't need to hit a particular file dimensions then you can accomplish single cross quality centered encoding instead. the product quality should be all the way to 2 pass vbr, but you can not choose the record size you will .
 
 
Recommended Posts:
how long did it take you to lose the baby weight after birth
 
help with converting to mp4 for my ipod official nero forum
 
whats the quickest way to lose weight without going to the gym
Journalisée
Pages: [1] Imprimer 
« sujet précédent | | sujet suivant »
Aller à:  

Propulsé par MySQL Propulsé par PHP Simple Machines Forum | Propulsé par SMF 1.0.7.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. Tous droits réservés.
XHTML 1.0 Transitionnel valide ! CSS valide !